Philosophy of social science and some problem Essay

Philosophy of kindly science and some problem - Essay ExampleLet us now examine Society, which is a sum total of individuals, interacting in finite space in infinite variety of ways. To understand the conglomerate society by using empirically observable objectivity is perhaps the core objective of affable science. To rationally explain the complexity of derivatives that individual interactions create in society is the unsaid mandate of loving Science. Therefore Social Science may be defined as the rational and systematic discover of human society in all its forms with the aim of arriving at an enduring understanding, ac noesisd as much(prenominal) by a broad consensus of researchers, of affable phenomenon (Meyer.1999). In examining the philosophy of Social Science, we will attempt to canvas behind the veil and look at the core of the belief system which governs, regulates and defines the structure of noesis emanating from this limb of Human inquiry.Rationality forms the pr imary percept of philosophy of Social Science. The rationalistic view of knowledge is based on reason and reflection (Johannessen & Olaisen.2005), wherein empirically and objectively verifiable observation is articulated and cast in to paradigms and theories. We would now uniform to refer to the debate between naturalist and anti-naturalists which form the overall competing academic groups (ibid) within the philosophy of social science. ... Systemic approach however seeks to view the social world as system comprising of sub-systems and an epistemology combining naturalism and reason, aiming to understand, predict and control (Johannessen. 1997, quoted in Johannessen & Olaisen.2005), an attempted blending of objectivity, subjectivity and intersubjectivity. The Naturalist position sharing the disregard for subjective experience is constructed on the following four pillars1. Empiricism2. Positivism & neo-Positivism (Vienna Circle)3. world4. Rationalism (Karl Popper)(Bunge.1996 quote d in Johannessen & Olaisen.2005 )Empiricists base their argument on a presumptive bias, that it is only perception which provides the knowledge (Turner.1991 quoted in Johannessen & Olaisen.2005). They have a dogmatic view that knowledge is experience and subsequent reflection on and about it. The primary concern is observable. The Positivists and neo-Positivist emanated from Vienna School (1926-1936). These Logical Empiricists concentrate on empirical testability, verifiable data and induction. They dont recognize non-linear causative factors like emotions etc. and term them as unscientific and out of scientific context (Von Wright. 1971quoted in Johannessen & Olaisen.2005). It was an attempt to introduce mathematical precision in the realm of imprecise social knowledge. Neo-Positivists based their epistemology on Instrumental Rationality. Realism is an epistemological doctrine that knowledge attempts to represents reality (Bunge.1981, p. IX ). Realism has further branched off in t o Nave Realism, Critical Realism and Scientific Realism (Johannessen & Olaisen.2005). Rationalisms most important sub-doctrine is Methodological Individualism, which states that social