Differences Between Jefferson and Hamilton Schools Essay - 3

Differences Between Jefferson and Hamilton Schools - Essay ExampleThis notion is supported by the expla commonwealth that elites have much resources and better skills set for the formation and execution of government. This view is further disregarded by Jefferson through another(prenominal) counter-argument that every form of government is corruptible and giving such function to limited individuals makes rest of the human race vulnerable. Hamilton, on the other hand, believes that for slosheder control over a system, executives in the government need to be heavy and have complete sovereignty (Geer et al. 13). Another fundamental difference between Jefferson and Hamiltonian flackes is the presence of state government. Jefferson believes that the fraction of power between state and national governments would allow citizens to have more(prenominal) control of governments decisions whereas Hamilton recognizes the concept of strong national government. Other than supporting citize ns extensive rights, Jefferson believes that expanding gateways of influence would allow better casualness to people and will keep government accountable for its actions. This view is also contested by Hamiltonian approach as it believes that restriction in gateways would allow access of only educated, skilled and experienced elites to the government matters. Jeffersonian view believes that state should be more involved in internal matters instead of global issues. A hamiltonian approach, on the contrary, believes that strong strategic positioning in global affairs through established industrial and military power would benefit United States (Cunningham 106). Analyzing these differences helps in understanding that a Hamiltonian approach provides a more holistic system of government. It is understandable that all the individuals i.e. elites and common men, cannot have the same profile and skills for participating in government. Therefore, allowing educated individuals to have access to government offices ensures that only the most suitable and capable talent runs this institution. Of course, selecting elites representing polar social segments would benefit American citizens more. There are rather limited benefits accrued to the American nation due to irreconcilable differences among these two approaches. Now, United States has a system which allows elites to represent interests of communities and states. Both of these regimes have strong disagreements regarding structure and role of government. Perhaps, finding a middle way i.e. system run by elites for the social welfare of Commons would be more suitable. Question No. 6 Division of Power in American Constitution Division in power represents a division of authority among different branches of government on with national and state governments. The federal government divides into legislature which is Congress, executives which include president and other bureaucracy, and judiciary which is ultimate Court and federal courts (Geer et al. 11). Another name for this vertical division of power is the separation of powers. This division of power among different branches of government ensures that no branch becomes too independent and strong in its authority and operations that it harms the interests of common citizens. This system of branches having authority over each other is called checks and balance.