Comparing Virtue and Vice in Garrick’s Romeo and Juliet and Bowdler’s R

Virtue versus vice is of great concern in the 18th century, an issue that causes a major shift in the notification of plays on the stage. Stage writers equal well-known plays to meet the criteria and expectations of the time. Contributing to the general acceptance of virtue on stage is the enforcement of decency and cleanliness by both the regnant class and the audience. A famous actor of the time, David Garrick, not only abided by these rules but also worked them to his advantage. Garrick packed theater houses with his talent and versatility as an actor, trance at the same time promoting an acceptance of cleaner versions of plays. Many of these adapted plays were by Shakespeare, though Garrick himself wrote plays that were as universally accepted. Audiences today may rap the inadequacy of these adaptations, but during the 18th century audiences expected and loved them. What were these changes on the button and where did they originate? Garrick himself does not begin this move ment towards virtue, but simply accepts the changes present. In 1698, Jeremy Collier wrote A Short View of the Immortality and Profaneness of the English Stage. This scrap strongly attacks the current conditions of the theater and the various immoral works by certain authors currently published. The Longman Anthology of British Literature writes, by portraying execration in ways that give delight, Jeremy Collier argued contemporary plays cultivated in their audiences the vices of their characters (2270 Longman Anthology of British Literature). These authors include such notable minds as John Dryden, William Congreve and William Wycherley. Collier especially criticizes the profane use of language and the abuse of clergy all of which, he felt, manage... ...sctn=1Garrick, David. The Dramatic Works of David Garrick, Esq. Vo. 1 London, 1798.Greenbalt, ed. The Norton Shakespeare Based on theOxford Edition. New York London, 1997.Frye, Northrop. establish date 1986. Mark W. Scott, ed. pgs 575-579.Hume, Robert D. Before the Bard Shakespeare in Early Eighteenth-Century London. ELH 64.1 (1997) 41-75.November 14, 2000. <http//muse.jhu.edu/journals/elh/v064/64.1hume.html.Jameson, Anna Brownell. endeavor date 1833. Mark W. Scott, ed. pgs 423-425.Knight, Joseph. David Garrick Literature Criticism from 1400 to 1800. Vol. 15. November 7, 2000.http//galenet.com/serv/LitRC/hitsc=1&b=17171779&savedsrch=&NR=Garrick&OP=contains&DT= originator+RE.Scott, Mark W. ed. Shakespeare Criticism. Kansas City Gale Research Company, 1987.Ulrici, Hermann. Essay date 1847. Mark W. Scott, ed. pgs 427-428.