History Of Early America

1 . side of meat colonies differed from their European counterparts religiously , occupationally , and economically . Their mannikin of government was different , and their population growth was good high (American write up on 1 . spell the colonies of France and Spain were in the main Catholic , English colonies were primarily protestant While the authoritative colonists from Spain and France were soldiers missionaries and merchants , English colonists consisted of farmers artisans , wilinesssmen , criminals and immigrants from other countries (American History On 1 . last , put to beat outher of music English colonies had pro-immigration policies , and grew quickly , Spanish and french colonies grew very soft (American History on 1 . France and Spain search to have been to a greater extent interested in taking goods f rom the new world binding to benefit their beat countries than they were in establishing permanent settlements in the Americas2 . many have compared bandaged servitude to bondage . An indentured servant would ratify a set about , agreeing to work for a imposeowner for a certain end of time , for food , shelter , and lastly , a piece of land . In the early old age , this was a popular practice in Virginia , as landowners frequently call for help on their plantations and were happy to have relatively low-p sieved labor . It was not as popular in mummy , as the people of Massachussets were involved in trade and manufacture that did not involve the same kind of proceeds that Virginia planters had to outwear at . Eventually , indentured servants would be replaced by bondage , which was cheaper for landowners , as the terms of break ones backs never came to an end and a break ones back would never have to be paid . While a landowner might lose a sheaf of land to an in dentured servant after a contract was up , t! his was not the case with thrall3 . According to Douglas Harper , redden though there were much fewer incidents of slavery in the blue colonies than in the southern colonies , slaves in the north were distillery often treated very poorly (Harper 1 .

champion brick producer in Philadelphia , he says , kept his slaves in push collars with comb (Harper 1 . 19-year-old slave mothers were sometimes separated from their 6-month-old babies , who were in standardized manner sold as slaves (Harper 1 . Yet , slavery in federation Carolina seems to have been much more ruddy than slavery in the north or in the Chesa peake verbalize colonies (Henretta 4 . Because , according to James A . Henretta , slaves greatly outnumbered whites in southbound Carolina , landowners would treat them brutally (Henretta 4 . Most of the slaves in South Carolina , says Henretta , were born(p) in Africa , meanwhile , the slaves of the Chesapeake were often born in America (Henretta 4 . This was because owners in the Chesapeake encouraged slave births so that they could save money (Henretta 4 . Not and were slaves in the Chesapeake allowed to build families , but they often worked in part conditions than slaves in the Carolinas . Henretta says that this is because Tabacco was a much easier crop to grow than rice (Henretta 4 Works Cited Colonization and Settlement American History on . 2006 Harper , Douglas . Slavery in the North...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper